This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was to keep the article without merging. GeoffWho, me? 17:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
There is not enough info and no sources/references for this to stand alone as its own article. Since it is a type of tamale, it would fit in that article. HotshotCleaner (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support <agree with merge> Benzband (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose until more context - I'd like to see someone familiar with the topic to explain the difference first, rather than have systemic bias. - M0rphzone (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I found and added a book source for the guajolota article and cleaned it up a bit. It can probably stand on its own, since it is, after all, a tamale sandwich. GeoffWho, me? 17:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.