Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Srimonbanik2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Srimonbanik2007

Srimonbanik2007 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected


16 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

The only edit they've made is one which perfectly reproduces the text of one of Srimonbanik's sockpuppets.

See: [[1]] and [[2]] AriTheHorseTalk to me! 12:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oi, I forgot that you can put two accounts into one investigation. Can somebody who is better versed in the format of this noticeboard please merge this and the above if necessary.
AriTheHorseTalk to me! 12:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  • Added account to template/report I suspect filer was intending to also report per the diff provided. --TheSandDoctor Talk 06:14, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • IP too old to action, account CU  Blocked and tagged. Closing. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

16 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Immediately after I removed the edits by one of the latest socks GauMutra: [3], [4], [5]. Another new account comes up and restores them [6]. Same aggressive talking style, same rapid editing and editing the same election pages. MrMkG (talk) 13:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Confirmed, blocked and tagged. @Drmies: check out the last entry of my user page on CU-wiki for the smoking gun.-- Ponyobons mots 16:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Edits so far are restoring back to the preferred version of Srimonbanik2007. [7] vs [8]. Ravensfire (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

  •  Highly likely, yes. I'll tag and block. --Yamla (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

23 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Their edit [9] changing the position to centre-left has been common from SB2007 socks - [10], [11] Ravensfire (talk) 13:51, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


26 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Edits to Indian National Congress page [12] are very similar to two earlier Srimonbanik2007 socks [13]. First edit ever was a revert [14], topics of interest seem similar enough (Indian politics, specifically infoboxes). Soni (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC) Soni (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The account is also restoring old edits. [15]:[16] MrMkG (talk) 19:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]


28 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

Reverting others on INC related infoboxes. I do not know all the common behaviours for Srimonbanik's socks, but unexplained reverts feels like one of them. This may be less clear cut than my last report. Soni (talk) 12:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I feel more confident now. One of the reverts they made also changes the order of INC ideologies, identical behaviour to seen in other SrimonBanik socks. Soni (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
  • This sockmaster consistently creates strange usernames, sometimes in other languages just like this one.
  • Also one of his edit he restored was a edit that was previously done by a another sock. The user also altered the ideology of the INC in an article. ZenDragoX (User) | (Contact) 12:04, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]