Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2024 May 16

May 16[edit]

File:Fair use image Mariusz Stepien.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to Google and scotsman.com, Mariusz Stepien is still alive as of 2022 and no news mentioning if the subject is deceased, as such, this file fails WP:NFCC1. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 05:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ataturk observing a military exercise.jpg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file with no provenance. If from after 1928, it will in all likelihood still be copyrighted in the US due to the URAA restorations. As we know nothing about its authorship, it may well even still be copyrighted in Turkey today if the photographer died after 1953. Felix QW (talk) 17:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amazon Luna Controller.png[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Game controllers are utilitarian objects. Someone should be able to take a free photograph of this particular device. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joan Osborne - One Of Us.ogg[edit]

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

De-PROD rationale was this: the chorus is intrinsic to the meaning of the song, like the guitar solo in Free Bird. It's more important than a textual description. However, the sample of "Free Bird" was deleted (FFD discussion). I'm still unconvinced that One of Us (Joan Osborne song) would be still inadequately understood without a sample like this, and I'm still unconvinced that the sample and free text provide info different and uneqivalent from each other (or maybe I was confusing what I said with WP:FREER).

Sure, the chorus and partial second verse heard in the sample help readers identify the part of the song, but I still don't know why other editors think it contextually signifies the whole song other than (supposed?) mistrusting the adequacy of free content. On the contrary, reading the article, the free text adequately summarizes what the song is generally about and the popularity and reception of the song. George Ho (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.