Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 October 26

< October 25	October 27 >

October 26[edit]

File:OldStSimonsLighthouse.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this to the Commons by hand, so this version isn't needed. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 01:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are we using a low-resolution version instead of the former high-resolution version? --Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The old version has a higher number of pixels but it is of lower resolution. Years ago I saw a print of the photo at the lighthouse and I took a photo of it with my camera and uploaded it. A day or two ago I found a digital copy of the original photograph, so you can actually see more details in it. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 17:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MATTTREVITHICKGARBAGE.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by TLSuda (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MATTTREVITHICKGARBAGE.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Unclear if uploader is copyright holder. Missing permission if not. Kelly ^hi! 16:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Attributed to User:Koolgiy, which redirect to uploader's userpage after being renamed. I see no reason to doubt the license claim. — ξ ^xplicit 03:36, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw the original objection, but file should still be deleted based on it being unused and unlikely to be of any encyclopedic use. No objection to relisting at FFD. Kelly ^hi! 07:52, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ξ ^xplicit 03:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rafting Tara.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Larger duplicate for Commons image (same name). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cover art of Moon Taxi's debut album, Melodica.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8: cover art should only be in the article about the album but not in the article about the band. Stefan2 (talk) 15:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tilak.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused userphoto. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mondeo.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, very low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pförtchen.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality. There's a higher quality picture of the same building at c:File:Pförtchen.jpg.

The dewiki source was deleted by User:JuTa as a file available on Commons, but the log message doesn't reveal what the file name on Commons is. The photographer isn't credited, so the attribution requirement is currently not satisfied. Stefan2 (talk) 17:57, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The de: file is exactly the one here, which is a scaled down duplicate of the commons file uploaded by the same user. I deleted the de: file in 2010 as ShadowsCommons. regards. --JuTa (talk) 08:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fetty Wap performing 2015.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Materialscientist (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copyright violation not fair use he is still alive from getty images http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/fetty-wap-performs-during-billboard-hot-100-festival-day-2-news-photo/485127222 92.237.211.110 (talk) 23:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Files like this should normally be tagged with {{db-f7}}. I have added that template to the file. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.