Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Neskuchne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:21, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Neskuchne[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We cannot have an article for every single battle in every single village in Ukraine. This one is not notable at all. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Russia, and Ukraine. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 12:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fully agree. Even in the context of neighboring battles, Neskuchne was insignificant. Speedy delete/merge to counteroffensive page. Jebiguess (talk) 18:58, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, guy who created the article. what exactly is wrong with the article I made? Salfanto (talk) 23:56, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is not actually with your article (which is not bad at all), but with the subject. At this point, it is WP:TOOSOON to know if this particular battle will have any lasting significance outside the horrific local impacts. In fact, I think it highly unlikely, but anything is possible. The policies you want to look at are WP:SIGCOV and WP:EVENTCRIT. A good example is the 1940 Battle of Ardennes. A lot happened there, some of it fascinating, none of it historically pivotal. It is (and belongs) in the overall Battle of France article. Similarly, Neskuchne belongs (until history tells us otherwise) in the overall article for the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive. Hope this helps. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:37, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you. I think merging the article with the overall article for the 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive will be a good idea Salfanto (talk) 14:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive - Part of 2023 Ukrainian counteroffensive where it is already mentioned. A couple of good sources that could enhance that article should be added there. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
could we keep the info box if we do end up merging the article? Salfanto (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why we would. It's not a major part of the counteroffensive. HappyWith (talk) 02:35, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess, but the article body should be kept when merged Salfanto (talk) 00:57, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Merge in to the Counteroffensive - Article is not very big and mainly is just stating that the battle happened. The Article doesn't meet the notability at all. This could be used if we merge in to a small section of Donetsk Oblast section of the 2023 Ukrainian Counteroffensive. Someone0317 (talk) 10:08, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.