User talk:Harimia

May 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm CpX41. I noticed that you recently removed content from Reciprocal Access Agreement without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CpX41 (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Remsense诉 11:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chinese culture. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Remsense诉 11:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan,Hong Kong and Macau, Singapore are also be in Chinese Culture. I am not familiar with the Policies though, I do not edit disruptly. Harimia (talk) 11:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Indians in Korea, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Remsense诉 10:16, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Remsense诉 06:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Indians in Korea

added a link pointing to Hwaseong

Kim Ku

added a link pointing to South Korean

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Singapore uses Simplified Chinese as its official written form of the language[edit]

So please stop changing official titles from simplified to traditional characters ([1]) or adding traditional Chinese into fields meant for official languages ([2]). Doesn't matter if you think traditional Chinese is "widespreadly used", that still doesn't make it any more official than other unofficial languages like Singlish or Hokkien. Bennv123 (talk) 01:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indians in Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hwaseong.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]