User talk:Fusecrush

October 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Donald Albury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Taino, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please see Wikipedia:Verifiability#Self-published sources. Donald Albury 12:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your addition of a source to Taino because student papers and theses below the doctoral level are generally not accepted as reliable sources, per Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Scholarship. - Donald Albury 15:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Birth places / death places[edit]

Hi @Fusecrush:, please stop putting birth and death places in the opening brackets of biographies. They do not belong here. Birth and death places go in the infobox, or in the main body e.g. in "Early life" or in "Life and career" in the format of a sentence. The opening brackets should contain dates only. Please familiarise yourself with Wikipedia:Manual of Style before you make any further edits to biographies. Otherwise, welcome and good to have you on board! Thanks. Jkaharper (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, it won't happen again Fusecrush (talk) 10:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mirrors[edit]

Thanks for contributing to the article Cumberland Presbyterian Church (Peoria, Illinois). However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 14:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again here and here. Please be more careful when evaluating your sources. Sam Kuru (talk) 03:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Empty info boxes[edit]

Please do not add empty info boxes to articles. Knitsey (talk) 19:39, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also not sure why you're adding additional spaces between words as edited at Tony Giammalva Knitsey (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it's better. --Fusecrush (talk) 13:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)--Fusecrush (talk) 13:17, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for you[edit]

Here are some sources that are related to Singapore's economic miracle and may be helpful to you, based upon your post:

Huff, W. G. (6 December 1995). "What is the Singapore model of economic development?". academic.oup.com. 19 (6): 735–759. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035339. Retrieved 12 January 2023.
Y C Lim, Linda (2016). Singapore's Economic Development: Retrospection And Reflections. New Jersey. ISBN 9814723479. Retrieved 12 January 2023. Singapore is known internationally for its successful economic development. Key to its economic successes is a variety of policies put into place over the past 50 years since its independence.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
Ulrich Volz; Peter J. Morgan; Naoyuki Yoshino (26 October 2018). Routledge Handbook of Banking and Finance in Asia. Taylor & Francis. pp. 165–178. ISBN 978-1-134-86214-6. Over the past five decades, Singapore has established a sound and progressive financial centre of international repute that serves both the local economy and the Asia Pacific region. As an international financial centre, it is home to a high concentration of over 1,200 financial institutions which offer a myriad of products and services across diverse asset classes.
"Singapore's Transformation into a Global Financial Hub" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-01-12. Retrieved 12 January 2023. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 2021-01-02 suggested (help)
Mugabi, Isaac (17 July 2020). "Ghana, Rwanda seek to emulate Singapore's economic model". dw.com. Deutsche Welle. Archived from the original on 12 January 2023. Retrieved 12 January 2023. In 1995, Ghana announced that it would achieve a middle-income status similar to Singapore by 2020. Rwanda too, says it aspires to be as successful as the Asian country. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 2 January 2021 suggested (help)
Finkelstein, Daniel (26 January 2021). "Britain couldn't be Singapore even if we tried". thetimes.co.uk. The Times. While Lee and the Singapore model were much admired by free market gurus like Milton Friedman, its attitude to the role of government in the economy has been very different from that of Thatcherite Conservatives. The Singapore economic miracle has been planned. Its government used sovereign wealth funds, public ownership and other forms of public direction and investment to move from a labour-intensive economy to a skill-intensive one, then to a capital-intensive economy, a technology-intensive one and in the past 20 years to a knowledge-intensive economy. At each stage there has been planning in education as well, particularly driving up standards in mathematics.

222.97.121.97 (talk) 15:09, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

wow! great! thank you a lot Fusecrush (talk) 16:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ONE account[edit]

Fusecrush, you get ONE account. Perhaps you can explain the other--I think you know what I mean. Kuru, I wouldn't care so much if this editor, with this and the other CU-confirmed account, wasn't making so many useless and unexplained little edits. Please see my note on User talk:Just like YOUrs. Drmies (talk) 16:02, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think maybe the IP overlapped. I used public internet and quite common chrome browser. I never add unsourced material by any reason - it's quite stupid activity. Neither I disrupt the pages by adding fakes. I think Just_like_YOUrs account was perhaps some test account. I really don't know. Fusecrush (talk) 10:19, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]