Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sink Cat

Sink Cat

Sink Cat (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

18 May 2024[edit]

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

Suspected sockpuppets[edit]

JetpackJackson (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

The account JetpackJackson was registered in January, but made its first edit today to support Sink Cat in a contentious talk page discussion less than thirty minutes after SinkCat commented. This is not typical behavior from new editors, in my experience. Sink Cat denies being the same person as JetpackJackson. (t · c) buidhe 02:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments[edit]

Neither explanation fully makes sense to me, so CheckUser requested. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Geolocates to different but neighbouring countries, but one of the geolocations is particularly poor so it may be closer than it looks. I'd say Unlikely from a technical standpoint. Does not rule out off-wiki coordination. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 11:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not enough evidence to take action. I'm sure whoever closes the RfC will weigh drive-by votes appropriately. Spicy (talk) 01:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]