Jump to content

Wikipedia:No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

31 May 2024

28 January 2024

2 January 2023

27 June 2022

22 May 2022

  • curprev 23:2023:20, 22 May 2022El komodos drago talk contribs 8,356 bytes +487 Added note about adding sources to the article as discussed in the talk page section 'Ways to overcome WP:Notability'. There has been a shift over time to a 'challenge everything' style of editing (regrettably in my opinion), meaning the assumption this page makes that editors will have checked for sources no longer holds true. undo

31 March 2022

  • curprev 18:3118:31, 31 March 2022Catsmoke talk contribsm 7,869 bytes −3 Modified photo caption to make comparison more reasonable, putting the comparison of the Swedish tree on a one-to-one basis with other trees. Especially since the previous version was arguing that an otherwise-unidentified grouping of trees was inherently not notable, and a grouping of anonymous trees might be notable in its identity as a geographic feature (for example, a forest may be notable, despite its lack of notable individual trees). undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

19 October 2021

27 November 2020

20 April 2020

17 April 2020

28 February 2020

1 February 2020

12 July 2019

6 October 2017

20 June 2017

16 June 2017

15 June 2017

4 May 2016

26 April 2016

24 April 2016

22 April 2016

3 February 2016

19 December 2015

10 December 2015

2 August 2015

30 July 2015

9 July 2015

12 March 2015

28 September 2014

17 August 2014

2 April 2014

1 April 2014

6 November 2013

8 June 2013

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)